Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Catherine Cartan Bellis vs Jamie Loeb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bellis vs Loeb analysis and find out who is favored!
Catherine Cartan Bellis vs Jamie Loeb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bellis has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Loeb has won 48.02%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bellis, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Loeb has won 53.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 39.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bellis has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Loeb has saved 55.92% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bellis has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Loeb winning 50.85% (W/L 30/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bellis has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 91% (W/L 10/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 22/ 17). Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 8/ 16).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Bellis winning 2 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Bellis winning 5 and Loeb winning 4. The last match between Bellis and Loeb was at the W80 Tyler, 30-10-2020, Second, Hard with Catherine Cartan Bellis getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:48:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bellis and Loeb have played a deciding set 3 times, with Bellis winning 2 times and Loeb 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bellis winning 0, and Loeb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bellis has played against opponents with an average rank of while Loeb has played against players with an average rank of 293.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bellis has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Loeb has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bellis has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Loeb has converted 48.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bellis 2 - 1 Loeb
Ret.
Rank
35
High
25
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
1
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
284
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
67% (139-67)
Career Total W/L
55% (295-244)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
58% (15-11)
$866,825
Career Prize Money
$219,866
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Catherine Cartan Bellis | Jamie Loeb |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 4 |
| Games Won | 41 | 36 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 18 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:0 | 1:48:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (164/271) | 54% (124/230) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (116/164) | 64% (79/124) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (46/107) | 49% (52/106) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (12/18) | 39% (9/23) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (99/230) | 40% (109/271) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Jamie Loeb
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| 6-3 4-6 6-3 |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Jamie Loeb
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 3-6 6-1 6-3 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Catherine Cartan Bellis
50%
(
40 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
12
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Catherine Cartan Bellis | Jamie Loeb |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (15/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (35/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (300/256) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 80% (8/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (6/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 78 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 89 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:43:23 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 314.15 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 55% (955/1747) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (638/955) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (386/791) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (104/222) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (817/1805) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (15/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (15/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 87% (15/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 13% (15/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 18% (11/2) |
Catherine Cartan Bellis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Catherine Cartan Bellis
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
8 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
45 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
48 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Aliona Bolsova
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(0) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Jamie Loeb
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Aliona Bolsova
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
6-0 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 6-7(4) ret. | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
48
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Sara Errani
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
31 of
41)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Gabriela Lee
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
56%
(
54 of
97)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
100)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katrina Scott
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Akasha Urhobo
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Kolie Allen
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Bronte Murgett
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Bellis Vs Loeb Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jamie Loeb
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
